List of Abstract
The impact of globalisation on international relations
The global community: blogging! My summary!
Omar, A.M. (2023). The impact of globalisation on international relations. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 12 (11), 1023-1026 Summary Omar's 2023 article, "The impact of globalisation on international relations," explores the far-reaching consequences of globalization on international relations. Published in the International Journal of Science and Research, the study relies on secondary sources, including books, journals, and online resources. The article highlights the pivotal role of technological advancements, transportation, and communication in driving globalization, facilitating the cross-border flow of people, goods, services, capital, and ideas. The study reveals that this increased interconnectedness has profoundly impacted international relations, introducing new perspectives and approaches worldwide. The author emphasizes the significance of technological and communication advancements in accelerating globalization, providing a comprehensive analysis of the instrumentalities of globalization and their impact on international relations. While the article offers valuable insights into the dynamics of globalization and international relations, its reliance on secondary literature may introduce potential researcher bias. Nonetheless, the study's thorough examination of the subject matter makes it a useful resource for understanding the complex interactions between globalization and international relations. This article is a valuable resource for research on globalization and international relations, providing a clear understanding of the instrumentalities driving globalization and their impact on international relations. The study's findings can inform analysis of why some countries are more globalized and advanced than others, making it a useful reference for further research in this area.
The global community: blogging! My summary!
Todd J. Moss’s article,
“The Anchored State: Nigeria and the Global Economy,” published in the Journal of International Development, explores the apparent paradox of Nigeria, Africa’s largest economy, which nonetheless struggles with development challenges often associated with the “resource curse”. Key themes addressed in the paper likely include:
- The Resource Curse: Nigeria is often cited as an archetype of the resource curse, where reliance on oil has led to economic distortions, high corruption, and a lack of diversification.
- Political Economy of Policy Making: The paper suggests that rent-seeking behavior and the interests of powerful political elites drive the implementation of import-dependent and protectionist policies that hinder industrial capacity and make it difficult to adopt new technology or liberalize the economy for inclusive growth.
- State Capacity and Governance: The article may examine the challenges of governance and state capacity in Nigeria, suggesting that self-interest often supersedes the promotion of public good and effective service delivery.
- Global Economy Linkages: It analyzes how Nigeria’s integration into the global economy, primarily as an oil exporter, has shaped its internal political and economic structures, leading to a state that is “anchored” or stuck in a particular development equilibrium.
- Policy Implications: The paper likely concludes by suggesting that fundamental, radical changes in the political economy are necessary to achieve meaningful reforms and sustainable development, drawing parallels with the development stages of emerging economies in Asia.
This study explores Nigeria’s relationship with the global economy, highlighting the challenges and opportunities presented by globalization. The author finds that Nigeria’s economic development has been hindered by its dependence on oil exports and vulnerability to global economic shocks, citing fluctuations in global oil prices as a key factor. To address this, Moss recommends diversifying the economy and developing the manufacturing sector to reduce dependence on oil exports. The study is well-researched, leveraging a qualitative approach and secondary data analysis to provide valuable insights into Nigeria’s economic development. As a foreign expert, Moss brings an objective perspective to the study, adding credibility to the analysis. This research can inform analysis of Nigeria’s economic diplomatic relations and identify areas for improvement, making it a useful resource for studies on globalization and economic development in Nigeria Moss, Todd. J. (2018). The anchored state: Nigeria and the global economy. Journal of International Development, vol: 30, 5, 737-754. DOI: 10.1002/jid.3356
The global community: blogging! My summary!
- Author: Ogwu, J.U.J.
- Year: 2018
- Title: Nigeria’s diplomatic relations in a globalized world
- Journal: Journal of International Relations
- Volume: 16
- Issue: 2
- Pages: 45-60
J.U.J. (Joy Uche Angela) Ogwu is a known figure in Nigerian foreign policy and international relations, having served as Nigeria’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations and as Director-General of the Nigerian Institute of International Affairs (NIIA) This study examines Nigeria’s diplomatic relations within the context of globalization, revealing a focus on economic diplomacy, peace, and security in the West African sub-region. Nigeria’s significant role in regional organizations like ECOWAS and the African Union underscores its commitment to these goals. The author recommends prioritizing economic diplomacy and strengthening diplomatic ties to advance national interests. The paper is well-researched, leveraging a qualitative approach and secondary data analysis to provide valuable insights into Nigeria’s foreign policy. The findings are supported by empirical evidence, and the recommendations are practical and policy-relevant. This research contributes meaningfully to understanding the intersection of globalization and international relations. This paper is particularly useful for researchers and policymakers interested in Nigeria’s diplomatic efforts and the role of economic diplomacy in promoting national interests. Its findings can inform policy decisions and contribute to the broader discourse on globalization and international relations.
The article “Globalisation and the politics of economic integration in Africa: The case of Nigeria,” authored by Ian Taylor, argues that the process of economic integration in Africa, specifically Nigeria, is significantly influenced by the forces of globalization, which often exacerbate existing inequalities and challenges on the continent.
Key points from the article include:
- Globalization’s Uneven Impact: The paper suggests that while developed countries tend to benefit significantly from globalization, developing countries like Nigeria often do not profit to the same extent, leading to an unequal relationship.
- External Influence on Policy: International financial institutions such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), often seen as key drivers of globalization, have a major influence on Nigeria’s economic policies (e.g., Structural Adjustment Programmes, privatization), which can have negative domestic consequences.
- Political Economy Perspective: Utilizing a political economy framework, Taylor likely analyzes how global economic conditions and the pursuit of economic interests by Western capitalist economies can undermine national security and socio-economic development in African nations.
- Regional Responses to Global Forces: The article examines how African elites attempt to use regional integration projects (such as ECOWAS) as a way to engage with the global economy, but these efforts often reflect neo-liberal impulses that can be contested by local reactions and alternative forms of regional connectivity.
- Exacerbating Challenges: Instead of solving the core economic and social issues, the pressures of globalization have often made them worse in Nigeria, increasing inequality and dependency on foreign capital.
- Need for Nuanced Understanding: The case of Nigeria highlights the necessity for a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between globalization, economic development, and regional integration, moving beyond the simple narrative of “global village” benefits
The global community: blogging! My summary!
Taylor, I. (2019). Globalisation and the politics of economic integration in Africa: The case of Nigeria. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, vol. 37, 1: 45-60. This study examines Nigeria’s experience with globalization, highlighting the country’s efforts to promote economic cooperation and regional integration, particularly within ECOWAS. The author recommends prioritizing economic diversification and strengthening diplomatic relations to benefit from globalization. The study’s qualitative approach and analysis of secondary data provide valuable insights into Nigeria’s economic diplomacy. Taylor’s expertise in African studies adds credibility to the work. However, the reliance on secondary sources may limit the study’s ability to fully capture the complexities of globalization’s impact on Nigeria’s economy. This research can inform a nuanced understanding of the politics of economic integration and guide studies on globalization and economic diplomatic relations in developing countries.
Global interaction! My abstract!! My blog!!!
Nanyonga, S. (2019). How globalization has changed diplomacy. Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies. RAIS Conference Proceedings, August 19-20. Pp 146 – 152. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.338619Nanyonga’s 2019 paper, “How globalization has changed diplomacy,” explores the impact of globalization on diplomatic relations among states. Published in the RAIS Conference Proceedings, the study adopts a qualitative research approach to examine the changes in time and space affecting diplomacy. The findings suggest that despite the growing influence of non-state actors, government representatives continue to dominate diplomatic channels, protecting the field of diplomacy from external influences. The study highlights a crucial issue in international relations, noting that globalization has led to a shift in power dynamics, with power no longer concentrated solely among states. Instead, multinational corporations, non-state actors, and international organizations have emerged as significant players. This redistribution of power has implications for diplomatic relations, and the study provides valuable insights into the complex interactions between state and non-state actors.
While the study raises important questions about the nature of diplomacy in a globalized world, its reliance on secondary sources limits the validity of its conclusions. Further empirical research is needed to support the author’s claims and provide a more nuanced understanding of the impact of globalization on diplomacy. Nonetheless, the study contributes to ongoing debates about the evolution of diplomacy and the role of non-state actors in international relations.
This study is relevant to research on diplomatic relations in the context of globalization, particularly in highlighting the shift in power dynamics and the ongoing dominance of government representatives in diplomatic channels. The study’s findings and limitations suggest avenues for further investigation, including empirical research into the role of non-state actors in diplomacy and the implications of globalization for diplomatic relations.
